Vitreous LabsEnergy transparency
Great Britain · the operating fleet

Ferrybridge BESS BMU-2

76 MW, about 251 MWh (3.3 hours, measured from its behaviour) in South Lancashire, Yorkshire and Humber. Everything on this page is read from published data for the 364 days to 16 October 2026, or is labelled as an estimate.

Part of Ferrybridge BESS, one of 2 balancing units at one site totalling 152 MW. This page is the T_FERRB-2 unit alone.

What it is

Registered power76 MW balancing mechanism registration
Storage duration3.3 hours measured from twenty one days of behaviour
Charging zoneSouth Lancashire, Yorkshire and Humber
Connection siteWakefield
PostcodeWF11 8RD
Balancing mechanism unitT_FERRB-2

Who owns it and who trades it

Traded bySSE BATTERY SALISBURY LIMITEDconfirmed, Elexon's register
Owned bynot published anywhere we can read
UltimatelySSE confirmed source

How we know. The register names no owner for this unit. It is the second balancing unit of the Ferrybridge battery, and the first carries SSE Ferrybridge Battery Limited as its owner. One battery, two registrations.

Market registers name the party that sells into the market, which for a battery is usually an optimiser under contract rather than the owner. Elexon's balancing mechanism unit register names the seller here and the name is checked against it on every build. How we tell them apart

What it earned

Line364 days to 16 October 2026
Balancing mechanism£979k
Response and reserve auctions auction implied£86k
Capacity marketno agreement we can attach
Three lines together£1.1m

Balancing is offer revenue and does not net off the cost of the power. The response and reserve figure is the value implied by the published auction results, award quantity times clearing price times the length of the delivery window, and not a settled payment. Capacity market income is the cleared price raised for inflation where the auction set a base period, split by month on EMRS's weights. Method

Outside the balancing mechanism, derived from the meter

Elexon publishes what this unit's meter recorded every half hour. Take away the balancing volumes NESO accepted and what is left is the position the unit ran outside the balancing mechanism: its wholesale trading, its frequency response delivery, and its losses, together. This unit held a frequency response contract in 1,523 of those half hours. The energy the contract asked of it, contracted megawatts times NESO's published delivery curve at the measured grid frequency, is taken out of the position and valued at the imbalance price, because it sits outside the unit's declared position and that is the price Elexon settles it at. What remains is the traded position, valued at the market index. The volumes are measured. The prices are public benchmarks, not this unit's trades. The product is derived, and is shown apart from the three measured lines above. 359 days to 11 October 2026, 45 of them still provisional in Elexon's settlement runs. Method and caveats

LineMWh or £
Metered export, what crossed the meter out39,804 MWh
Metered import, what crossed the meter in47,950 MWh
Equivalent full cycles, everything sent out over one full charge159 over 359 days, 161 a year at that rate
Apparent meter to meter efficiency83%, plausible: losses plus a standing load that is material against a modest throughput
Balancing offers accepted18,900 MWh
Balancing bids accepted14,855 MWh
Position outside balancing, export37,044 MWh
Position outside balancing, import49,235 MWh
Of which expected response delivery, net−1,783 MWh 507 out, 2,290 in
Traded position, net−10,409 MWh 37,172 out, 47,581 in
Traded position at the market index, sold£5.0m
Traded position at the market index, bought£3.7m
Traded position, net, at the index£1.3m
Response delivery, net, at the imbalance price−£202k −£197k at the index
Balancing and outside balancing together£2.0m £27.23/kW/yr

When it moved, against when power was dear

Across every half hour this unit was metered the market index averaged £97.34. What it sent out was worth £134.42 a megawatt hour at that same index, 1.38 times the average. What it took in was worth £78.67, 0.81 times. Selling above one and buying below one is a unit positioned into the dear half hours and out of the cheap ones. It measures the half hours it chose, not the price anyone paid it, which is not published.

What it paid to buy energy back

When NESO accepts a bid, this unit delivers less than it had already sold, or takes more in. It pays for the energy it no longer delivers, and that payment is most of what makes the balancing figure above negative. Whether that is a cost or a margin depends on the price it paid. Across 14,855 MWh of accepted bids it paid an average of £83.52 a megawatt hour. The market index averaged £112.61 across those same half hours, so it bought back at £29.09 a megawatt hour below the going price.

Price it paidVolumeAverageCash
below zero1,006 MWh−£24.09£24k received
£0 to £25662 MWh£13.58£9k
£25 to £50965 MWh£38.69£37k
£50 to £752,074 MWh£65.81£136k
£75 to £1004,941 MWh£86.57£428k
above £1005,207 MWh£125.67£654k

On 1,006 MWh the price was below zero: NESO paid this unit an average of £24.09 a megawatt hour to take energy, £24k in all. That is a constrained network with more generation on it than it can move.

The other direction, offers, is much smaller here: 18,900 MWh where NESO asked for more, paid at an average of £117.71 against an index of £78.95.

Physical checks passed: the meter never exceeded the registered power by more than fifteen per cent, and the year's exports against imports are what a battery does.

Where it stands

Balancing incomewhole fleet, £/kW/yr72nd percentile100 units
Balancing incomeEngland and Wales peer group61st percentile72 units
All three measured lineswhole fleet, £/kW/yr40th percentile230 units
Energy sent outhours at full power65th percentile98 units
Energy taken inhours at full power42nd percentile98 units

Percentiles, so 90 means better than nine in ten of the cohort named beside it, on that measure alone, over the same 364 days. Rates are pounds per kilowatt per year, annualised over the days the unit has been on the system, the same figures the performance league ranks on. A high position in the taken-in table is not a fault: a constraint asset is paid to charge, and charging is its job.

The nearest comparables

The five nearest in size in England and Wales, and this battery among them, ranked by what each was paid for every kilowatt it holds over the 364 days to the same date. Duration is not used to choose them, because too few batteries sit within half an hour of this one. Same market, same rules, same weather.

BatteryMWHoursMeasured, per kW
Ocker Hill582h£63.1/kW/yr
Sizing John572.5h£41.5/kW/yr
Ferrybridge BESS BMU-1762h£35.3/kW/yr
Tye Lane BESS594h£28.4/kW/yr
Ferrybridge BESS BMU-2this battery763.3h£14.1/kW/yr
KXP Immingham BESS812h£12.5/kW/yr

See it on the map

Open the operating map here

Every figure on this page traces to a published file. If something here is wrong about your asset, the methods section says how to tell us.