Vitreous LabsEnergy transparency
Great Britain · the operating fleet

Wilton BESS (LIONB-2)

50 MW in North East England. Everything on this page is read from published data for the 364 days to 16 October 2026, or is labelled as an estimate.

Part of Wilton BESS, one of 3 balancing units at one site totalling 150 MW. This page is the T_LIONB-2 unit alone.

What it is

Registered power50 MW balancing mechanism registration
Charging zoneNorth East England
Connection siteWilton International
PostcodeTS6 8JF
Balancing mechanism unitT_LIONB-2

Who owns it and who trades it

Traded bySembcorp (Wilton BESS) Ltdconfirmed, Elexon's register
Owned bynot published anywhere we can read

Market registers name the party that sells into the market, which for a battery is usually an optimiser under contract rather than the owner. Elexon's balancing mechanism unit register names the seller here and the name is checked against it on every build. How we tell them apart

What it earned

Line364 days to 16 October 2026
Balancing mechanism−£214k
Response and reserve auctions auction implied£3k
Capacity marketno agreement we can attach
Three lines togethernot netted

Balancing is offer revenue and does not net off the cost of the power. The response and reserve figure is the value implied by the published auction results, award quantity times clearing price times the length of the delivery window, and not a settled payment. Capacity market income is the cleared price raised for inflation where the auction set a base period, split by month on EMRS's weights. Method

Outside the balancing mechanism, derived from the meter

Elexon publishes what this unit's meter recorded every half hour. Take away the balancing volumes NESO accepted and what is left is the position the unit ran outside the balancing mechanism: its wholesale trading, its frequency response delivery, and its losses, together. This unit held no frequency response contract in the window, so the whole position is treated as traded. The volumes are measured. The prices are public benchmarks, not this unit's trades. The product is derived, and is shown apart from the three measured lines above. 245 days to 11 October 2026, 45 of them still provisional in Elexon's settlement runs. Method and caveats

LineMWh or £
Metered export, what crossed the meter out5,183 MWh
Metered import, what crossed the meter in6,568 MWh
Equivalent full cycles, everything sent out over one full charge·
Apparent meter to meter efficiency79%, plausible: losses plus a standing load that is material against a modest throughput
Balancing offers accepted1,288 MWh
Balancing bids accepted2,674 MWh
Position outside balancing, export6,379 MWh
Position outside balancing, import6,377 MWh
Valued at the market index, sold£993k
Valued at the market index, bought£587k
Outside balancing, net, at the index£407k
Balancing and outside balancing together£256k £7.64/kW/yr

When it moved, against when power was dear

Across every half hour this unit was metered the market index averaged £105.10. What it sent out was worth £155.72 a megawatt hour at that same index, 1.48 times the average. What it took in was worth £91.99, 0.88 times. Selling above one and buying below one is a unit positioned into the dear half hours and out of the cheap ones. It measures the half hours it chose, not the price anyone paid it, which is not published.

What it paid to buy energy back

When NESO accepts a bid, this unit delivers less than it had already sold, or takes more in. It pays for the energy it no longer delivers, and that payment is most of what makes the balancing figure above negative. Whether that is a cost or a margin depends on the price it paid. Across 2,674 MWh of accepted bids it paid an average of £118.82 a megawatt hour. The market index averaged £167.23 across those same half hours, so it bought back at £48.41 a megawatt hour below the going price.

Price it paidVolumeAverageCash
below zero43 MWh−£14.21£604 received
£0 to £2541 MWh£9.44£391
£25 to £5070 MWh£37.86£3k
£50 to £75150 MWh£64.71£10k
£75 to £100376 MWh£88.45£33k
above £1001,994 MWh£136.58£272k

On 43 MWh the price was below zero: NESO paid this unit an average of £14.21 a megawatt hour to take energy, £604 in all. That is a constrained network with more generation on it than it can move.

The other direction, offers, is much smaller here: 1,288 MWh where NESO asked for more, paid at an average of £130.06 against an index of £72.22.

Checks this unit did not pass cleanly. Published anyway, because a flagged figure with its flag is more use than a blank.

  • only 245 of 364 days metered

Where it stands

Balancing incomewhole fleet, £/kW/yr66th percentile100 units
Balancing incomeEngland and Wales peer group52nd percentile72 units
All three measured lineswhole fleet, £/kW/yr12th percentile230 units
Energy sent outhours at full power16th percentile98 units
Energy taken inhours at full power13th percentile98 units

Percentiles, so 90 means better than nine in ten of the cohort named beside it, on that measure alone, over the same 364 days. Rates are pounds per kilowatt per year, annualised over the days the unit has been on the system, the same figures the performance league ranks on. A high position in the taken-in table is not a fault: a constraint asset is paid to charge, and charging is its job.

The nearest comparables

The five nearest in size in England and Wales, and this battery among them, ranked by what each was paid for every kilowatt it holds over the 364 days to the same date. How long this battery can run for is not published, so duration is not used to choose them. Same market, same rules, same weather.

BatteryMWHoursMeasured, per kW
Grendon502h£89.2/kW/yr
Creyke Beck50not known£74.5/kW/yr
Pelham501h£67.4/kW/yr
Minety South501h£65.7/kW/yr
Pillswood 2 Battery Storage501.5h£59.4/kW/yr
Wilton BESS (LIONB-2)this battery50not knownnot netted

The three lines are not added together for this site. It paid £395k to charge and the lines we can measure paid it £184k. The energy it bought was sold in the wholesale market and nothing published measures that sale, so subtracting one from the other would show a loss it does not make.

See it on the map

Open the operating map here

Every figure on this page traces to a published file. If something here is wrong about your asset, the methods section says how to tell us.