Vitreous LabsEnergy transparency
Great Britain · the operating fleet

Pillswood 1 Battery Storage

50 MW, about 75 MWh (1.5 hours, from the capacity market de-rating class) in South Lancashire, Yorkshire and Humber. Everything on this page is read from published data for the 364 days to 16 October 2026, or is labelled as an estimate.

Part of Pillswood, one of 2 balancing units at one site totalling 100 MW. This page is the E_PILLB-1 unit alone.

What it is

Registered power50 MW balancing mechanism registration
Storage duration1.5 hours capacity market de-rating class
Charging zoneSouth Lancashire, Yorkshire and Humber
Connection siteEast Riding of Yorkshire
PostcodeHU16 5SB
Balancing mechanism unitE_PILLB-1

Who owns it and who trades it

Traded byBP Gas Marketing Limitedruns several sitesconfirmed, Elexon's register
Owned byHEIT PW LIMITED
Owner established fromcapacity market registered holder
UltimatelyHarmony Energy Income Trust (assets under Foresight Group) probable source

How we know. The HEIT SPV naming; the trust sold its assets to Foresight.

Market registers name the party that sells into the market, which for a battery is usually an optimiser under contract rather than the owner. Elexon's balancing mechanism unit register names the seller here and the name is checked against it on every build. How we tell them apart

What it earned

Line364 days to 16 October 2026
Balancing mechanism£1.4m
Response and reserve auctions auction implied£922k
Capacity market£558k
Three lines together£2.9m

Balancing is offer revenue and does not net off the cost of the power. The response and reserve figure is the value implied by the published auction results, award quantity times clearing price times the length of the delivery window, and not a settled payment. Capacity market income is the cleared price raised for inflation where the auction set a base period, split by month on EMRS's weights. Method

Outside the balancing mechanism, derived from the meter

Elexon publishes what this unit's meter recorded every half hour. Take away the balancing volumes NESO accepted and what is left is the position the unit ran outside the balancing mechanism: its wholesale trading, its frequency response delivery, and its losses, together. This unit held a frequency response contract in 8,569 of those half hours. The energy the contract asked of it, contracted megawatts times NESO's published delivery curve at the measured grid frequency, is taken out of the position and valued at the imbalance price, because it sits outside the unit's declared position and that is the price Elexon settles it at. What remains is the traded position, valued at the market index. In 6 half hours a contract was held but the grid frequency is not yet held, so those are left in the traded position. The volumes are measured. The prices are public benchmarks, not this unit's trades. The product is derived, and is shown apart from the three measured lines above. 359 days to 11 October 2026, 45 of them still provisional in Elexon's settlement runs. Method and caveats

LineMWh or £
Metered export, what crossed the meter out40,992 MWh
Metered import, what crossed the meter in47,112 MWh
Equivalent full cycles, everything sent out over one full charge548 over 359 days, 557 a year at that rate
Apparent meter to meter efficiency87%, an ordinary battery: round trip losses alone
Balancing offers accepted29,357 MWh
Balancing bids accepted22,623 MWh
Position outside balancing, export41,246 MWh
Position outside balancing, import54,101 MWh
Of which expected response delivery, net−3,419 MWh 5,169 out, 8,588 in
Traded position, net−9,436 MWh 39,782 out, 49,218 in
Traded position at the market index, sold£5.0m
Traded position at the market index, bought£3.8m
Traded position, net, at the index£1.2m
Response delivery, net, at the imbalance price−£424k −£376k at the index
Balancing and outside balancing together£2.1m £43.67/kW/yr

When it moved, against when power was dear

Across every half hour this unit was metered the market index averaged £97.34. What it sent out was worth £124.60 a megawatt hour at that same index, 1.28 times the average. What it took in was worth £77.10, 0.79 times. Selling above one and buying below one is a unit positioned into the dear half hours and out of the cheap ones. It measures the half hours it chose, not the price anyone paid it, which is not published.

What it paid to buy energy back

When NESO accepts a bid, this unit delivers less than it had already sold, or takes more in. It pays for the energy it no longer delivers, and that payment is most of what makes the balancing figure above negative. Whether that is a cost or a margin depends on the price it paid. Across 22,623 MWh of accepted bids it paid an average of £85.76 a megawatt hour. The market index averaged £118.77 across those same half hours, so it bought back at £33.01 a megawatt hour below the going price.

Price it paidVolumeAverageCash
below zero867 MWh−£17.04£15k received
£0 to £251,038 MWh£11.59£12k
£25 to £501,633 MWh£39.36£64k
£50 to £754,482 MWh£64.91£291k
£75 to £1006,623 MWh£87.92£582k
above £1007,980 MWh£126.00£1.0m

On 867 MWh the price was below zero: NESO paid this unit an average of £17.04 a megawatt hour to take energy, £15k in all. That is a constrained network with more generation on it than it can move.

The other direction, offers, is much smaller here: 29,357 MWh where NESO asked for more, paid at an average of £113.95 against an index of £81.62.

Physical checks passed: the meter never exceeded the registered power by more than fifteen per cent, and the year's exports against imports are what a battery does.

Where it stands

Balancing incomewhole fleet, £/kW/yr89th percentile100 units
Balancing incomeEngland and Wales peer group85th percentile72 units
Balancing income1.5 hour duration cohort85th percentile75 units
All three measured lineswhole fleet, £/kW/yr91st percentile230 units
Energy sent outhours at full power91st percentile98 units
Energy taken inhours at full power76th percentile98 units

Percentiles, so 90 means better than nine in ten of the cohort named beside it, on that measure alone, over the same 364 days. Rates are pounds per kilowatt per year, annualised over the days the unit has been on the system, the same figures the performance league ranks on. A high position in the taken-in table is not a fault: a constraint asset is paid to charge, and charging is its job.

The nearest comparables

The five nearest in size in England and Wales, and this battery among them, ranked by what each was paid for every kilowatt it holds over the 364 days to the same date. They run for about the same length of time. Same market, same rules, same weather.

BatteryMWHoursMeasured, per kW
Pillswood 2 Battery Storage501.5h£59.4/kW/yr
Pillswood 1 Battery Storagethis battery501.5h£57.8/kW/yr
Richborough Energy Park 2502h£36.4/kW/yr
Bredbury BESS502h£34.4/kW/yr
Skelmersdale Battery502h£24.7/kW/yr
Hawthorn Pit BESS502h£19.9/kW/yr

See it on the map

Open the operating map here

Every figure on this page traces to a published file. If something here is wrong about your asset, the methods section says how to tell us.