Vitreous LabsEnergy transparency
Great Britain · the operating fleet

Hawkers Hill Battery

20 MW, about 30 MWh (1.5 hours, from the capacity market de-rating class) in Somerset and Wessex. Everything on this page is read from published data for the 364 days to 16 October 2026, or is labelled as an estimate.

What it is

Registered power20 MW balancing mechanism registration
Storage duration1.5 hours capacity market de-rating class
Charging zoneSomerset and Wessex
Connection siteHawkers Hill
Balancing mechanism unitE_HAWKB-1

Who owns it and who trades it

Traded byTesla Motors Limitedruns several sitesconfirmed, Elexon's register
Owned byHAWKERS HILL ENERGY PARK LIMITED
Owner established fromcapacity market registered holder
UltimatelyTagEnergy confirmed source

How we know. The control filing gives the company to TagEnergy UK Limited at three quarters or more with the right to appoint directors, since November 2020, and an individual held it before that. The capacity market agrees, holding a site called Hawkers Hill in the TagEnergy name 230 metres away. The registered office is RES's, which reflects who developed and administers it rather than who owns it.

Market registers name the party that sells into the market, which for a battery is usually an optimiser under contract rather than the owner. Elexon's balancing mechanism unit register names the seller here and the name is checked against it on every build. How we tell them apart

What it earned

Line364 days to 16 October 2026
Balancing mechanism£510k
Response and reserve auctions auction implied£0
Capacity market£228k
Three lines together£738k

Balancing is offer revenue and does not net off the cost of the power. The response and reserve figure is the value implied by the published auction results, award quantity times clearing price times the length of the delivery window, and not a settled payment. Capacity market income is the cleared price raised for inflation where the auction set a base period, split by month on EMRS's weights. Method

Outside the balancing mechanism, derived from the meter

Elexon publishes what this unit's meter recorded every half hour. Take away the balancing volumes NESO accepted and what is left is the position the unit ran outside the balancing mechanism: its wholesale trading, its frequency response delivery, and its losses, together. This unit held a frequency response contract in 7,686 of those half hours. The energy the contract asked of it, contracted megawatts times NESO's published delivery curve at the measured grid frequency, is taken out of the position and valued at the imbalance price, because it sits outside the unit's declared position and that is the price Elexon settles it at. What remains is the traded position, valued at the market index. In 8 half hours a contract was held but the grid frequency is not yet held, so those are left in the traded position. The volumes are measured. The prices are public benchmarks, not this unit's trades. The product is derived, and is shown apart from the three measured lines above. 359 days to 11 October 2026, 45 of them still provisional in Elexon's settlement runs. Method and caveats

LineMWh or £
Metered export, what crossed the meter out15,251 MWh
Metered import, what crossed the meter in17,401 MWh
Equivalent full cycles, everything sent out over one full charge508 over 359 days, 517 a year at that rate
Apparent meter to meter efficiency88%, an ordinary battery: round trip losses alone
Balancing offers accepted12,186 MWh
Balancing bids accepted11,506 MWh
Position outside balancing, export13,053 MWh
Position outside balancing, import15,883 MWh
Of which expected response delivery, net−3,189 MWh 1,388 out, 4,577 in
Traded position, net360 MWh 13,361 out, 13,001 in
Traded position at the market index, sold£1.4m
Traded position at the market index, bought£964k
Traded position, net, at the index£431k
Response delivery, net, at the imbalance price−£294k −£282k at the index
Balancing and outside balancing together£639k £32.50/kW/yr

When it moved, against when power was dear

Across every half hour this unit was metered the market index averaged £97.34. What it sent out was worth £104.41 a megawatt hour at that same index, 1.07 times the average. What it took in was worth £74.12, 0.76 times. Selling above one and buying below one is a unit positioned into the dear half hours and out of the cheap ones. It measures the half hours it chose, not the price anyone paid it, which is not published.

What it paid to buy energy back

When NESO accepts a bid, this unit delivers less than it had already sold, or takes more in. It pays for the energy it no longer delivers, and that payment is most of what makes the balancing figure above negative. Whether that is a cost or a margin depends on the price it paid. Across 11,506 MWh of accepted bids it paid an average of £74.29 a megawatt hour. The market index averaged £96.63 across those same half hours, so it bought back at £22.34 a megawatt hour below the going price.

Price it paidVolumeAverageCash
below zero515 MWh−£18.29£9k received
£0 to £25554 MWh£11.89£7k
£25 to £50843 MWh£38.22£32k
£50 to £752,934 MWh£64.88£190k
£75 to £1004,680 MWh£87.57£410k
above £1001,981 MWh£113.69£225k

On 515 MWh the price was below zero: NESO paid this unit an average of £18.29 a megawatt hour to take energy, £9k in all. That is a constrained network with more generation on it than it can move.

The other direction, offers, is much smaller here: 12,186 MWh where NESO asked for more, paid at an average of £111.34 against an index of £82.57.

Physical checks passed: the meter never exceeded the registered power by more than fifteen per cent, and the year's exports against imports are what a battery does.

Where it stands

Balancing incomewhole fleet, £/kW/yr90th percentile100 units
Balancing incomeEngland and Wales peer group86th percentile72 units
Balancing income1.5 hour duration cohort86th percentile75 units
Balancing incomebatteries sold by Tesla Motors Limited86th percentile15 units
All three measured lineswhole fleet, £/kW/yr83rd percentile230 units
Energy sent outhours at full power93rd percentile98 units
Energy taken inhours at full power84th percentile98 units

Percentiles, so 90 means better than nine in ten of the cohort named beside it, on that measure alone, over the same 364 days. Rates are pounds per kilowatt per year, annualised over the days the unit has been on the system, the same figures the performance league ranks on. A high position in the taken-in table is not a fault: a constraint asset is paid to charge, and charging is its job.

The nearest comparables

The five nearest in size in England and Wales, and this battery among them, ranked by what each was paid for every kilowatt it holds over the 364 days to the same date. They run for about the same length of time. Same market, same rules, same weather.

BatteryMWHoursMeasured, per kW
Oldham BESS202h£81.5/kW/yr
Willoughby201h£70.9/kW/yr
Carnegie Road 1202h£54.2/kW/yr
Farnham BESS202h£39.9/kW/yr
Gerrards Cross BESS201h£38.9/kW/yr
Hawkers Hill Batterythis battery201.5h£37.0/kW/yr

See it on the map

Open the operating map here

Every figure on this page traces to a published file. If something here is wrong about your asset, the methods section says how to tell us.