Byers Brae (BYBRB-1)
26 MW in Stirlingshire and Fife. Everything on this page is read from published data for the 364 days to 16 October 2026, or is labelled as an estimate.
What it is
| Registered power | 26 MW response and reserve auction registration |
| Charging zone | Stirlingshire and Fife |
| Connection site | West Lothian |
| Postcode | EH48 1JY |
| Balancing mechanism unit | 2__NCPPR001 a supplier unit registered by the company that trades it; its balancing actions are counted on this page |
Who owns it and who trades it
| Traded by | OCTOPUS ENERGY TRADING LIMITEDruns several sitesconfirmed, Elexon's register |
| Owned by | not published anywhere we can read |
| Ultimately | Gresham House Energy Storage Fund confirmed source |
How we know. The register names no owner and NESO places the code at Arbroath, DD11 2QH. The code stem, the dates and Octopus's Elexon unit named Byers Brae say it is Byers Brae, the fund's West Lothian battery, which EDF01N took over two days after this code was last paid (gb/fleet_joins.py, 26 September 2026); either way it is the fund's.
Market registers name the party that sells into the market, which for a battery is usually an optimiser under contract rather than the owner. Elexon's balancing mechanism unit register names the seller here and the name is checked against it on every build. How we tell them apart
What it earned
| Line | 364 days to 16 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Balancing mechanism | −£90k |
| Response and reserve auctions auction implied | £101k |
| Capacity market | no agreement we can attach |
| Three lines together | £10k |
Balancing is offer revenue and does not net off the cost of the power. The response and reserve figure is the value implied by the published auction results, award quantity times clearing price times the length of the delivery window, and not a settled payment. Capacity market income is the cleared price raised for inflation where the auction set a base period, split by month on EMRS's weights. Method
Outside the balancing mechanism, derived from the meter
Elexon publishes what this unit's meter recorded every half hour. Take away the balancing volumes NESO accepted and what is left is the position the unit ran outside the balancing mechanism: its wholesale trading, its frequency response delivery, and its losses, together. This unit held no frequency response contract in the window, so the whole position is treated as traded. The volumes are measured. The prices are public benchmarks, not this unit's trades. The product is derived, and is shown apart from the three measured lines above. 339 days to 21 September 2026, 25 of them still provisional in Elexon's settlement runs. Method and caveats
| Line | MWh or £ |
|---|---|
| Metered export, what crossed the meter out | 0 MWh |
| Metered import, what crossed the meter in | 0 MWh |
| Equivalent full cycles, everything sent out over one full charge | · |
| Apparent meter to meter efficiency | · |
| Balancing offers accepted | 432 MWh |
| Balancing bids accepted | 5,631 MWh |
| Position outside balancing, export | 5,620 MWh |
| Position outside balancing, import | 421 MWh |
| Valued at the market index, sold | £471k |
| Valued at the market index, bought | £41k |
| Outside balancing, net, at the index | £430k |
| Balancing and outside balancing together | £340k £14.08/kW/yr |
When it moved, against when power was dear
Across every half hour this unit was metered the market index averaged £94.88. What it sent out was worth £83.77 a megawatt hour at that same index, 0.88 times the average. What it took in was worth £96.37, 1.02 times. Selling above one and buying below one is a unit positioned into the dear half hours and out of the cheap ones. It measures the half hours it chose, not the price anyone paid it, which is not published.
What it paid to buy energy back
When NESO accepts a bid, this unit delivers less than it had already sold, or takes more in. It pays for the energy it no longer delivers, and that payment is most of what makes the balancing figure above negative. Whether that is a cost or a margin depends on the price it paid. Across 5,631 MWh of accepted bids it paid an average of £25.90 a megawatt hour. The market index averaged £83.80 across those same half hours, so it bought back at £57.90 a megawatt hour below the going price.
| Price it paid | Volume | Average | Cash |
|---|---|---|---|
| below zero | 953 MWh | −£18.62 | £18k received |
| £0 to £25 | 1,312 MWh | £12.49 | £16k |
| £25 to £50 | 2,674 MWh | £34.95 | £93k |
| £50 to £75 | 429 MWh | £60.45 | £26k |
| £75 to £100 | 134 MWh | £87.43 | £12k |
| above £100 | 130 MWh | £124.53 | £16k |
On 953 MWh the price was below zero: NESO paid this unit an average of £18.62 a megawatt hour to take energy, £18k in all. That is a constrained network with more generation on it than it can move.
The other direction, offers, is much smaller here: 432 MWh where NESO asked for more, paid at an average of £129.05 against an index of £96.40.
Physical checks passed: the meter never exceeded the registered power by more than fifteen per cent, and the year's exports against imports are what a battery does.
The nearest comparables
The five nearest in size in Scotland, and this battery among them, ranked by what each was paid for every kilowatt it holds over the 364 days to the same date. How long this battery can run for is not published, so duration is not used to choose them. Same market, same rules, same weather.
| Battery | MW | Hours | Measured, per kW |
|---|---|---|---|
| South Redhouse | 16 | 1h | £30.5/kW/yr |
| Byers Brae (EDF01N) | 28 | 1h | £22.1/kW/yr |
| Shilton Lane BESS | 40 | 2h | £2.3/kW/yr |
| Erskine BESS | 30 | 2h | £1.9/kW/yr |
| Byers Brae (BYBRB-1)this battery | 26 | not known | £0.4/kW/yr |
| West Lothian | 29 | not known | £0.0/kW/yr |
See it on the map
Every figure on this page traces to a published file. If something here is wrong about your asset, the methods section says how to tell us.